Journal of Climatology & Weather Forecasting

The Distribution and Longevity of Icebergs During Heinrich Events

Priyanshu Sharma^{* *}Correspondence: Priyanshu Sharma, Department of Biotechnology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut, India, Tel: +91 7817804145, Email:

Author info »

Introduction

Heinrich event, any of a series of at least six large discharges of icebergs that carried coarse-grained rocky debris, apparently from North American ice sheets, into the North Atlantic Ocean at latitudes between 40° and 55°N, where the debris was later deposited on the ocean floor as the icebergs melted. We also observe a sizable seasonal variation in the locations of icebergs, primarily caused by shifting winds, and demonstrate that the spatial patterns of IRD for Heinrich Event 1 most closely match the locations of icebergs in the summer. According to proxy data, for icebergs to travel the distance suggested by Heinrich Layers, the water must be several degrees colder than temperatures predicted during the Last Glacial Maximum. The North American continent was covered by the former Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) for a sizable portion of the Quaternary epoch (2.58 Ma-present). The LIS experienced numerous periods of progress and retreat during its history that corresponded to glacial maxima [1]. The LIS, which had many huge ice streams that discharged icebergs into the western subpolar North Atlantic, mainly through Hudson Bay, at maxima, was more than 4 km thick near its core in Northeast Canada.

Ice Rafted Debris (IRD), which can be found from the Labrador Sea across the basin to Portugal, is evidence of episodic discharge from the LIS observed in sediment cores from the North Atlantic. Heinrich Layers vary in thickness and spatial extent. Between episodes, Heinrich Layers' spatial extent and thickness vary; this variability has been related to variations in the amount of ice involved these sediments, the precise method by which this happened is unclear. It has been proposed that the Heinrich Events' observed periodicity is caused by LIS instabilities. In this case, as the LIS expands, it occasionally reaches an unstable size that necessitates mass purging in the form of armadas of icebergs. An alternative hypothesis states that an ice shelf in the Labrador Sea may convey icebergs farther than they could stay in open sea, especially icebergs that are sediment-laden.The collapse of such an ice shelf could be encouraged by subsurface warming prior to a Heinrich Event, releasing the fresh water required to produce the climate signal associated with a Heinrich Event. Therefore, it has been suggested that the absence of the "buttressing effect" of a sizable ice shelf caused the Hudson Strait Ice Stream to accelerate and the production of numerous icebergs that were heavily laden with slit. A different estimate of the amount of fresh water involved in any of these scenarios would lead to a different climate forcing. Understanding the details of a Heinrich Event will be necessary to unravel this mechanism. Heinrich Events are associated with global climate change, despite being restricted to the North Atlantic. For instance, sediment cores from the Okinawa Trough in the East China Sea reveal cooling for Heinrich Events 1–5, while stalagmite records from China suggest minima in the power of the Asian monsoon during Heinrich events. Lake records from the southwest of the United States also reveal that Heinrich Events coincided with maximum lake size. These and countless more instances demonstrate how the climate change connected to the Heinrich events is abrupt and significant on a global scale. This relevance raises the possibility that there is a mechanism in place by which the effects of Heinrich Events can be transmitted from the North Atlantic to the rest of the world [2]. It has frequently been asserted that the worldwide impact observed to coincide with Heinrich Events is primarily caused by the disruption of the AMOC. In an effort to limit the locations, trajectories, and melting of icebergs during Heinrich Events, iceberg models have been deployed. Some of these research has discovered that the impact of fresh water on climate is accelerated when the melting of icebergs is explicitly modelled, as opposed to merely introducing liquid fresh water to the North Atlantic. Based on an expected concentration and distribution of sediments in icebergs, a separate study directly modelled the extent of Heinrich Layers and concomitant ice volume [3]. These two investigations made use of models with oceans with a spatial resolution of only about 3°. However, to more precisely identify individual iceberg tracks and pinpoint where IRD was deposited during Heinrich Events, finer scale modelling is required.

According to such studies, the effect of fresh water on climate is accelerated when the melting of icebergs is directly modelled rather than merely introducing liquid fresh water to the North Atlantic. Based on an expected concentration and distribution of sediments in icebergs, a separate study directly modelled the extent of Heinrich Layers and concomitant ice volume. These two investigations made use of models with oceans with a spatial resolution of only about 3° [4]. However, to more precisely identify individual iceberg tracks and pinpoint where IRD was deposited during Heinrich Events, finer scale modelling is required. The movement of icebergs and fresh water along the Eastern seaboard of the United States has been the subject of earlier modelling attempts utilizing finer scale grids. Rather than the larger region of IRD found across the IRD belt in the North Atlantic, the transfer of sediment from the British Irish Ice Sheet [5]. This study examines how iceberg size and climatic (environmental) variations affect the patterns of iceberg tracks using a model with a fine scale (1/6°; 18 km) ocean. Below, we make an effort to limit the effect that iceberg size has on its capacity to reach the extents predicted by Heinrich Layers. We also look into climatic factors that may have influenced these findings, such as the seasonality of iceberg position and the impact of sea surface temperature.

For the purpose of understanding the ocean, atmosphere, and climate, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Global Circulation Model was created there.In this investigation, we employ a version of the model that has 50 vertical levels with spacing ranging from 10m near the surface to 450 m at a depth of 6000 m and an eddy-permitting global ocean grid resolution of 1/6° (18 km). The resolution of our configuration of MITgcm is around 5–10 times higher than that of all the models involved in Phase 4 of the Paleoclimate Modeling [6].

Northern hemisphere

The model uses a seventh-order monotonicity-preserving advection technique to solve the ocean tracer transport equations. The model uses a seventh-order monotonicity-preserving advection technique to solve the ocean tracer transport equations. Vertical mixing is K-Profile parameterized, and there is no explicit horizontal diffusion. The dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice model which assumes a viscous-plastic ice rheology and calculates ice thickness, is coupled to the ocean model. The model is in equilibrium with regard to the presence of icebergs in the system at the conclusion of the trials conducted for this study [7]. The amount of icebergs in the model's system varies yearly, but on the timescale of these trials, the number of icebergs that calve into the system is equal to the number that melts. The model was set up to mimic glacial (LGM) boundary conditions, where sea level was 120 m lower than it is now and the ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere were at their full extent). The model is obliged to use averaged monthly outputs from fully linked Community Climate because the atmosphere is not coupled in these experiments. It makes sense that icebergs would last longer in a colder ocean since the amount of sensible heating will be reduced if the temperature differential between the icebergs and the water around them is lower. In order to produce the observed extents of Heinrich Layers, the ocean would have likely needed to have been much colder than simulated circumstances during the LGM. This difference's practical extent is calculated here. Given that sea surface temperatures are thought to have been cooler than LGM during Heinrich Events, this is a logical explanation

These findings might theoretically be expanded to deduce SST from Heinrich Layer extent with a plausible assumption about the size distribution of icebergs. On the other hand, it might be possible to determine the extent of the icebergs involved in a Heinrich Event if SST could be controlled by a different proxy. Such a method would be helpful for calculating the amount of ice released during a Heinrich Event, as well as maybe the dynamics of the ice sheet responsible for manufacturing the icebergs.

Numerous SST and iceberg size combinations are probably capable of generating sediment layers with a similar geological makeup. But this study shows how crucial it is to take these things into account when examining the climatic implications of Heinrich Layers. It follows that shrinking the ocean has a similar impact as growing it. Regarding the proportional influence of iceberg size and SST. It has been found that chilling the ocean has a similar impact to growing icebergs. Although the effects of these factors are equivalent, this research implies that they might be distinct in the geologic record. Instead, the winds governing the iceberg tracks mentioned above may hold the key to separating these two metrics and revealing additional information from the geologic record. Our findings indicate that in a Heinrich Event with smaller icebergs, more iceberg tracks would be routed to the northeast, cutting over the subpolar gyre, while bigger icebergs would tend to follow the North Atlantic Current roughly straight East across the Atlantic. These two possibilities would be noted. Heinrich layers North Atlantic sediments that have a high ratio of debris carried by ice to Foraminiferida shells and thus record episodes of major iceberg release or surges in the Laurentide ice sheet.

REFERENCES

1. Bavec S., et al. Geochemical investigation of mercury and other elements in urban soil of Idrija (Slovenia). J Geochem Explore (2015);154:213-23.

   [GoogleScholar] [CrossRef]

2. Andersson M., et al. Geochemistry of urban surface soils -Monitoring in Trondheim, Norway Geoderma. (2010);156:112-118.

   [GoogleScholar] [CrossRef]

3. Acosta JA., et al. Enrichment of metals in soils subjected to different land uses in a typical Mediterranean environment (Murcia City, southeast Spain). Appl Geochem. (2011);26:405-14.

   [GoogleScholar] [CrossRef]

4. Charlesworth S., et al. A review of the distribution of particulate trace elements in urban terrestrial environments and its application to considerations of risk. Environ Geochem Health. (2011);33: 103- 23.

   [GoogleScholar] [CrossRef]

5. Harikumar PS., & Jisha TS., Distribution pattern of trace metal pollutants in the sediments of an urban wetland in the southwest coast of India. Int J Environ Engr Sci Tech (2010);2(5): 840-50.

   [GoogleScholar]

6. Al-Momani IF., Assessment of trace metal distribution and contamination in surface soils of Amman, Jordan. Jordan J Chem (2009);4(1):77-87.

   [GoogleScholar]

7. Chatterjee A., & Banerjee RN. Science of total environment. (1999);227:175.

   [GoogleScholar] [CrossRef]