.
   
  Home  |  About Journal  |  Browse Articles  |  Editorial Board  |  Authors Guidelines  |  Submit Article  |  FAQ  |  Contact  
   

IJCRIMPH Articles:

Reliability of period of gestation determined by ultrasound scan measurements IJCRIMPH articles are provided for free based on an Open Access policy
'
International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health, 2011 - Vol. 3 No. 5

Author: Chrishantha Abeysena (1) *, Pushpa Jayawardana (2)

(1) Senior Lecturer / Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
(2) Professor / Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka

* Corresponding author


Abstract:

Objective: To determine reliability of period of gestation determined by three independent raters using four different foetal measurements.

Methods: One hundred and eighty pregnant women were divided into three equal groups. Each group was assigned a rater to perform ultrasound scan to measure bi-parietal diameter, femur length, abdominal circumference and head circumference and to compute the respective periods of gestation using these four measurements. Reliability between periods of gestation derived by each rater from above four measurements were analysed using repeated measure ANOVA. Results were expressed as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CsOV).

Results: For Raters I (F= 6.47; p=0.001) and II, (F= 4.80; p= 0.003), computations using abdominal circumferences resulted in the lowest mean periods of gestation (PsOG). For Rater III, computations using both femur length and abdominal circumference resulted in the lowest mean periods of gestation (F= 7.5; p=0.001). ICCs were 0.73 (95%CI 0.64–0.81) for Rater I, 0.78 (95% CI 0.70–0.85) for Rater II and 0.87 (95% CI 0.81– 0.91) for Rater III

When comparing CsOV, the highest variation for Raters I and III was observed for femur length. For Rater II it was bi-parietal diameter. The lowest variation for Rater I was observed for head circumference and for Raters II and III for abdominal circumference. The highest CsOV of all the PsOG were demonstrated by Rater III.

When comparing the differences between the highest and the lowest values for each period of gestation determined, the difference was more than two weeks for 38% (n=23), 24% (n=14) and 22% (n=13) of observations made by Raters I, II and III respectively. 

 

Conclusions: Reliability of period of gestation depends on the type of measurement taken, method of assessment and the rater who performs the measurements. Our findings are not conclusive enough to recommend any PsOG based on specific measurement more reliable than others. In-service training of the obstetricians is likely to improve the reliability of PsOG determined using ultra sound scan measurements.

 

Keywords: Gestational age, pregnancy duration, reliability, ultrasound scan

How to cite this article:

Abeysena C, Jayawardana P. Reliability of period of gestation determined by ultrasound scan measurements. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health. 2011; 3(5):334-339.

 
Article Options:
Abstract
Full Text (PDF)
Cite this article
Track Citations
Published Online: 30 May 2011
 
Article Sharing Tools:
Email to a friend:  Email
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

________________________________________________

All rights reserved. 2008-2011
International Online Medical Council (IOMC)
Locations of visitors to this page
Free counter and web stats